| Napa and Solano Counties Central Labor Council |
2012 GENERAL ELECTION CANDIDATE ENDORSEMENTS
Stop Prop 32
The Napa and Solano Counties Central Labor Council has endorsed the candidates and taken position on the measues and propositions for the upcoming General Election in November. Office: Dixon Mayor Jack Batchelor Dixon City Council Jerry Castanon Dixon City Council Ian Arnold Rio Vista Mayor Janith Norman Suisun City Council Lori Wilson Suisun City Council Sam Derting Vacaville City Council Ron Rowlett Solano Community College Board Member, Area 3 Rosemary Thurston Solano Community College Board Member, Area 5 Monica Brown Solano Community College Board Member, Area 7 Philip McCaffrey, Sr. Napa Mayor Peter Mott Napa City Council Alfred Pedroza Napa City Council Scott Sedgley American Canyon Mayor Leon Garcia American Canyon City Council Joan Bennett American Canyon City Council Kenneth Leary Napa Community College Board Member,Area 6 Rosaura Segura Napa Community College Board Member, Area 7 Rafael Rios Assembly District 11 Jim Frazier Solano County Supervisor Erin Hannigan Napa County Supervisor Mark Van Gorder
Proposition 30 Yes Proposition 32 NO Proposition 34 Yes Proposition 35 Yes Proposition 36 Yes Proposition 37 Yes Proposition 40 Yes City of Fairfield Measure P Yes City of Vacaville Measures I & M Yes Solano Community College Measure Q Yes
About the endorsement process: We held interviews over a four week period and our panel consisted of Police Officers, Firefighters, Teachers, School employees, Food Workers, Iron Workers, Electricians, Teamsters, Plumbers and Steamfitters, Sheet Metal Workers, Cement Masons, Operating Engineers, Bricklayers, Roofers, and our Service employees; asking the candidates tough questions on issues facing their members. We then met collectively and went over each race and discussed at length how each candidate might have impacted the men and women they represent. What makes our process so important is that all of these very different professions sent representatives with the important task of making recommendations on behalf of their members and then voting to represent them. It was tough, and not everyone agreed on every endorsement but we came away with recommendations that we felt were in the best interests for working people and their families. We struggled with whether or not to endorse people we have supported in the past, but may have voted against our members. We also looked past historical perceptions and took chances on new candidates that we may never have considered before. In other words they COMPROMISED. Does that sound familiar in today's political climate? Not lately! That's why we chose candidates that we feel can build coalitions, not divide the community - candidates willing stick to their words and continue to fight for our members once elected but more importantly will treat them with the dignity and respect they deserve! One thing that was very troubling was the number of candidates that were advocating stripping our members of benefits that have been fought for and gained over the past 50 years. These advances were gained by a generation of working people. We called these people the "greatest generation" and they paved the way for these benefits out of a sense of community and the belief that everyone deserved to have a basic living wage, a secure retirement and health care for them and their family. But to make matters worse, some of these same candidates and elected officials currently enjoy the same benefits they are attempting to destroy. The hypocrisy was not lost on our group as we asked if these same people, who were working in the 1980s, realized that if they were forced into the same benefit plan they are now advocating for the people who work for them, they would have not only have lost their retirement in the last financial meltdown, but they would also still have to be working to make ends meet! The other issue that concerned both leaders and members alike were the particular candidates that did not bother to even show up for interviews. While we understand that some candidates feel that they have a philosophical difference with Labor, for them to fail to even show up sends a very clear message to not only our members but all working people in the community, and that is that they do not take issues facing working men and women seriously enough to present and discuss their positions with our members. The reason that Labor organizations involve themselves in the political process is to have open dialogue with our representatives and an open door policy. These candidates send a clear message that the door is closed before we even knock. We have to move forward. We have to advance a productive and civil dialogue and find common ground. We must also remain mindful of mistakes that have compromised our welfare so as to avoid repeating them in the future.
Additional Resources |
|
|
© AFL-CIO. All rights reserved.
Photographs and illustrations, as well as text, cannot be used without permission from the AFL-CIO. |